|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
The Big Kahuna
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 1,493
Thanks: 17
Thanked 9 Times in 5 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
|
Top-side?
Top UW photographers agree that good land photography helps build your skill and 'eye' for getting good UW photos. Indeed on a recent course with Martin Edge, we spent a good few hours walking around the gardens in Bournemouth taking photos to prove points of good composition.
So, we have a Top-Side photo forum. Feel free to post your great top-side photos - but, when doing so, think "how does this prove an UW point". So, please bear this in mind - this isn't for photos of your partner, children, parents etc. Such posts will be removed. If you are unsure - then just ask before posting. Anyway, let's see em folks. Tim
__________________
My Equipment: Nexus ND70 Housing, Nikon D70, Nikon 60, 105 and 200 mm Micro Lenses with Manual Focus Multiport System, Nikon 12-24mm, Nikon 10.5mm; with FP-170 Dome port; Dual Inon Strobes on ULCS arms. And one Concerned Bank Manager Skype username: timing2211 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
I've spent a lot of time thinking about this one. It's such a great idea. I think I finally worked it out this morning. I take my dog for a walk every day in the woods, looking at the same trees and the same bushes, thinking every day 'when the spring comes I'll get some good pictures here... but how to use them to prove an underwater point......' then it hit me. I walk past those trees every day without really seeing them - just to look at them from a different angle, or close up to see the detail in the bark or the fungus growing on the trunk. So I stopped to look today and I couldn't believe just how much there was to see. Then I realised that so many people dive in exactly the same way. Everyone is always in such a hurry to get round and 'see' as much as possible or they are so intent on looking for the turtles or mantas or Napoleon Wrasse or whatever that they forget all about the little things.
Thanks Tim for this because now I don't have to wait until I am underwater again. I can look at a tree or a bush in exactly the same way I would a coral reef and practice plenty!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 585
Thanks: 14
Thanked 31 Times in 23 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Quote:
Rob
__________________
My Kit: Nikon D80, Nikon 60mm macro, Sigma 105mm macro, Tokina 10-17mm. Ikelite housing with twin Inon z240 strobes. www.emup.org.uk www.robcuss.co.uk |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 585
Thanks: 14
Thanked 31 Times in 23 Posts
|
Quote:
Most judges that we use normally seem to be construct in their criticisms and offer suggestions to back them up. For example, how a picture is cropped can make a real significant difference and I have seen many judges using card against prints to demonstrate this. I also tend to think that it is in the general photographic arena that really hits home the value of the rule of thirds and the need to avoid (generally) a single central subject. These are, in the non-professional pictures that I seem to see, the biggest problems in most underwater photos. I do certainly agree that photography follows fashions. I could quite happily avoid seeing another long exposure waterfall or picture of the British Museum for some time. The advantage for underwater photographers in a general camera club competitions is that, although some judges do not appreciate the difficulties involved, their shots tend to be very different from the mainstream and so stand out from the crowd. A pat on the back for your pictures is always appreciated. My club, Tandridge, has also been lucky enough to have talks and presentations from Len Dealey on underwater photography. We also have one coming up from Linda Pitkin (UNDERWATER PHOTOGRAPHS - Linda Pitkin's stock) on 17th May. If anyone lives in that part of the world, the talk is free and you would be welcome to attend. Daniel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 585
Thanks: 14
Thanked 31 Times in 23 Posts
|
The trouble will relying on post processing is that it is so time consuming. If you end up with a dozen shots to tinker with then any more levels will take some hours in front of the computer. I always try to get the image as near perfect in camera as possible because I am far too disorganised to adjust anyhting other than the levels before needing to print the shots.
Any chance of a write up of the course? DAniel |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags: topside |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|